Spaces:
Runtime error
Runtime error
Upload app.py with huggingface_hub
Browse files
app.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
import gradio as gr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
from app.utils import (
|
| 4 |
add_rank_and_format,
|
|
@@ -161,25 +165,11 @@ def main():
|
|
| 161 |
></iframe>
|
| 162 |
"""
|
| 163 |
)
|
|
|
|
| 164 |
with gr.TabItem("ViDoRe V3 (Pipeline)", id="vidore-v3-pipeline"):
|
| 165 |
gr.Markdown("# ViDoRe V3 (Pipeline Evaluation): Retrieval Performance for Complex Pipelines ⚙️")
|
| 166 |
gr.Markdown("### Assessing retrieval performance, latency, and compute costs of complex retrieval pipelines")
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
-
# gr.Markdown(
|
| 169 |
-
# """
|
| 170 |
-
# This leaderboard displays abstract pipeline evaluation results for ViDoRe V3 on **english-only queries**.
|
| 171 |
-
# Unlike model-only evaluations, these results showcase what full retrieval pipelines can achieve.
|
| 172 |
-
|
| 173 |
-
# Metrics regarding time complexity are also provided in the form of ("Indexing latency (second/doc)" and "Search latency (second/query)").
|
| 174 |
-
# Those are self-reported, highly hardware dependent, and should not be considered absolute.
|
| 175 |
-
# Nevertheless we felt it was quite important to ensure transparency and provide users with a rough understanding of the computational demands of each pipeline.
|
| 176 |
-
|
| 177 |
-
# Results are sourced from the [vidore-benchmark repository](https://github.com/illuin-tech/vidore-benchmark/tree/vidore_v3_pipeline/results).
|
| 178 |
-
|
| 179 |
-
# Those results are not directly comparable to the base ViDoRe v3 results, since they are computed on a different set of queries (english-only queries).
|
| 180 |
-
# """
|
| 181 |
-
# )
|
| 182 |
-
|
| 183 |
gr.Markdown(
|
| 184 |
"""
|
| 185 |
This leaderboard ranks full retrieval pipelines on **English-only queries** for **ViDoRe V3**. Instead of just testing standalone models, we evaluate real-world, multi-step retrieval systems. This includes everything from basic retrievers to advanced setups using AI agents, query reformulation, hybrid search, and any other creative retrieval pipeline one can imagine.
|
|
@@ -223,6 +213,79 @@ def main():
|
|
| 223 |
datatype_pipeline = ["number", "markdown", "number", "number", "number"] + ["number"] * len(datasets_columns_pipeline)
|
| 224 |
dataframe_pipeline = gr.Dataframe(data_pipeline, datatype=datatype_pipeline, type="pandas", elem_id="pipeline-table")
|
| 225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 226 |
def update_data_pipeline(metric, search_term, selected_columns):
|
| 227 |
pipeline_handler.get_pipeline_data()
|
| 228 |
data = pipeline_handler.render_df(metric, "english")
|
|
@@ -247,6 +310,10 @@ def main():
|
|
| 247 |
inputs=[metric_dropdown_pipeline],
|
| 248 |
outputs=dataframe_pipeline,
|
| 249 |
concurrency_limit=20,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 250 |
)
|
| 251 |
|
| 252 |
with gr.Row():
|
|
@@ -264,20 +331,42 @@ def main():
|
|
| 264 |
df = pipeline_handler.render_df(metric, "english")
|
| 265 |
return add_rank_and_format(df, benchmark_version=3, is_pipeline=True)
|
| 266 |
|
|
|
|
| 267 |
metric_dropdown_pipeline.change(
|
| 268 |
refresh_pipeline_data,
|
| 269 |
inputs=[metric_dropdown_pipeline],
|
| 270 |
outputs=dataframe_pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 271 |
)
|
|
|
|
| 272 |
research_textbox_pipeline.submit(
|
| 273 |
lambda metric, search_term, selected_columns: update_data_pipeline(metric, search_term, selected_columns),
|
| 274 |
inputs=[metric_dropdown_pipeline, research_textbox_pipeline, column_checkboxes_pipeline],
|
| 275 |
outputs=dataframe_pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 276 |
)
|
|
|
|
| 277 |
column_checkboxes_pipeline.change(
|
| 278 |
lambda metric, search_term, selected_columns: update_data_pipeline(metric, search_term, selected_columns),
|
| 279 |
inputs=[metric_dropdown_pipeline, research_textbox_pipeline, column_checkboxes_pipeline],
|
| 280 |
outputs=dataframe_pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 281 |
)
|
| 282 |
|
| 283 |
gr.Markdown(
|
|
@@ -297,7 +386,7 @@ def main():
|
|
| 297 |
eprint={2407.01449},
|
| 298 |
archivePrefix={arXiv},
|
| 299 |
primaryClass={cs.IR},
|
| 300 |
-
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01449},
|
| 301 |
}
|
| 302 |
@misc{loison2026vidore,
|
| 303 |
title={ViDoRe V3: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation in Complex Real-World Scenarios},
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
import re
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
import gradio as gr
|
| 4 |
+
import pandas as pd
|
| 5 |
+
import plotly.express as px
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
from app.utils import (
|
| 8 |
add_rank_and_format,
|
|
|
|
| 165 |
></iframe>
|
| 166 |
"""
|
| 167 |
)
|
| 168 |
+
|
| 169 |
with gr.TabItem("ViDoRe V3 (Pipeline)", id="vidore-v3-pipeline"):
|
| 170 |
gr.Markdown("# ViDoRe V3 (Pipeline Evaluation): Retrieval Performance for Complex Pipelines ⚙️")
|
| 171 |
gr.Markdown("### Assessing retrieval performance, latency, and compute costs of complex retrieval pipelines")
|
| 172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 173 |
gr.Markdown(
|
| 174 |
"""
|
| 175 |
This leaderboard ranks full retrieval pipelines on **English-only queries** for **ViDoRe V3**. Instead of just testing standalone models, we evaluate real-world, multi-step retrieval systems. This includes everything from basic retrievers to advanced setups using AI agents, query reformulation, hybrid search, and any other creative retrieval pipeline one can imagine.
|
|
|
|
| 213 |
datatype_pipeline = ["number", "markdown", "number", "number", "number"] + ["number"] * len(datasets_columns_pipeline)
|
| 214 |
dataframe_pipeline = gr.Dataframe(data_pipeline, datatype=datatype_pipeline, type="pandas", elem_id="pipeline-table")
|
| 215 |
|
| 216 |
+
def clean_pipeline_name(name):
|
| 217 |
+
if not isinstance(name, str):
|
| 218 |
+
return str(name)
|
| 219 |
+
# Remove Markdown links [text](url) -> text
|
| 220 |
+
name = re.sub(r'\[([^\]]+)\]\([^\)]+\)', r'\1', name)
|
| 221 |
+
# Remove HTML tags <a href="...">text</a> -> text
|
| 222 |
+
name = re.sub(r'<[^>]+>', '', name)
|
| 223 |
+
return name.strip()
|
| 224 |
+
|
| 225 |
+
def create_pipeline_plot(df, latency_col):
|
| 226 |
+
if df is None or len(df) == 0:
|
| 227 |
+
return None
|
| 228 |
+
|
| 229 |
+
# Ensure expected columns exist
|
| 230 |
+
if latency_col not in df.columns or "Average Score" not in df.columns or "Pipeline" not in df.columns:
|
| 231 |
+
return None
|
| 232 |
+
|
| 233 |
+
# Clean the dataframe for plotting
|
| 234 |
+
plot_df = df.copy()
|
| 235 |
+
|
| 236 |
+
# Strip HTML and Markdown for clean hover text
|
| 237 |
+
plot_df["Cleaned Pipeline"] = plot_df["Pipeline"].apply(clean_pipeline_name)
|
| 238 |
+
|
| 239 |
+
# Force numerical conversion (coerces weird strings to NaN)
|
| 240 |
+
plot_df[latency_col] = pd.to_numeric(plot_df[latency_col], errors='coerce')
|
| 241 |
+
plot_df["Average Score"] = pd.to_numeric(plot_df["Average Score"], errors='coerce')
|
| 242 |
+
|
| 243 |
+
# Drop NaNs
|
| 244 |
+
plot_df = plot_df.dropna(subset=[latency_col, "Average Score"])
|
| 245 |
+
|
| 246 |
+
# Filter out non-positive values to prevent log-scale math errors
|
| 247 |
+
plot_df = plot_df[plot_df[latency_col] > 0]
|
| 248 |
+
|
| 249 |
+
# Sort by the x-axis to prevent Plotly from drawing out-of-order categorical ticks
|
| 250 |
+
plot_df = plot_df.sort_values(by=latency_col)
|
| 251 |
+
|
| 252 |
+
if len(plot_df) == 0:
|
| 253 |
+
return None
|
| 254 |
+
|
| 255 |
+
fig = px.scatter(
|
| 256 |
+
plot_df,
|
| 257 |
+
x=latency_col,
|
| 258 |
+
y="Average Score",
|
| 259 |
+
hover_name="Cleaned Pipeline", # Use the clean text!
|
| 260 |
+
title=f"Mean Performance vs {latency_col}",
|
| 261 |
+
color="orange",
|
| 262 |
+
)
|
| 263 |
+
fig.update_layout(
|
| 264 |
+
plot_bgcolor='white'
|
| 265 |
+
)
|
| 266 |
+
|
| 267 |
+
# Explicitly force the axis to be log type so Plotly handles the spacing natively
|
| 268 |
+
fig.update_layout(
|
| 269 |
+
xaxis_type="log",
|
| 270 |
+
xaxis_title=latency_col,
|
| 271 |
+
yaxis_title="Average Score"
|
| 272 |
+
)
|
| 273 |
+
|
| 274 |
+
# Style the points
|
| 275 |
+
fig.update_traces(marker=dict(size=12, opacity=0.8, line=dict(width=1, color='DarkSlateGrey')))
|
| 276 |
+
return fig
|
| 277 |
+
|
| 278 |
+
with gr.Row():
|
| 279 |
+
latency_radio = gr.Radio(
|
| 280 |
+
choices=["Search latency (s/query)", "Indexing latency (s/doc)"],
|
| 281 |
+
value="Search latency (s/query)",
|
| 282 |
+
label="Select Latency Metric for X-Axis"
|
| 283 |
+
)
|
| 284 |
+
|
| 285 |
+
with gr.Row():
|
| 286 |
+
initial_fig = create_pipeline_plot(data_pipeline, "Search latency (s/query)")
|
| 287 |
+
performance_plot = gr.Plot(value=initial_fig)
|
| 288 |
+
|
| 289 |
def update_data_pipeline(metric, search_term, selected_columns):
|
| 290 |
pipeline_handler.get_pipeline_data()
|
| 291 |
data = pipeline_handler.render_df(metric, "english")
|
|
|
|
| 310 |
inputs=[metric_dropdown_pipeline],
|
| 311 |
outputs=dataframe_pipeline,
|
| 312 |
concurrency_limit=20,
|
| 313 |
+
).then(
|
| 314 |
+
fn=create_pipeline_plot,
|
| 315 |
+
inputs=[dataframe_pipeline, latency_radio],
|
| 316 |
+
outputs=performance_plot
|
| 317 |
)
|
| 318 |
|
| 319 |
with gr.Row():
|
|
|
|
| 331 |
df = pipeline_handler.render_df(metric, "english")
|
| 332 |
return add_rank_and_format(df, benchmark_version=3, is_pipeline=True)
|
| 333 |
|
| 334 |
+
# Update dataframe and then update the plot
|
| 335 |
metric_dropdown_pipeline.change(
|
| 336 |
refresh_pipeline_data,
|
| 337 |
inputs=[metric_dropdown_pipeline],
|
| 338 |
outputs=dataframe_pipeline,
|
| 339 |
+
).then(
|
| 340 |
+
fn=create_pipeline_plot,
|
| 341 |
+
inputs=[dataframe_pipeline, latency_radio],
|
| 342 |
+
outputs=performance_plot
|
| 343 |
)
|
| 344 |
+
|
| 345 |
research_textbox_pipeline.submit(
|
| 346 |
lambda metric, search_term, selected_columns: update_data_pipeline(metric, search_term, selected_columns),
|
| 347 |
inputs=[metric_dropdown_pipeline, research_textbox_pipeline, column_checkboxes_pipeline],
|
| 348 |
outputs=dataframe_pipeline,
|
| 349 |
+
).then(
|
| 350 |
+
fn=create_pipeline_plot,
|
| 351 |
+
inputs=[dataframe_pipeline, latency_radio],
|
| 352 |
+
outputs=performance_plot
|
| 353 |
)
|
| 354 |
+
|
| 355 |
column_checkboxes_pipeline.change(
|
| 356 |
lambda metric, search_term, selected_columns: update_data_pipeline(metric, search_term, selected_columns),
|
| 357 |
inputs=[metric_dropdown_pipeline, research_textbox_pipeline, column_checkboxes_pipeline],
|
| 358 |
outputs=dataframe_pipeline,
|
| 359 |
+
).then(
|
| 360 |
+
fn=create_pipeline_plot,
|
| 361 |
+
inputs=[dataframe_pipeline, latency_radio],
|
| 362 |
+
outputs=performance_plot
|
| 363 |
+
)
|
| 364 |
+
|
| 365 |
+
# Update plot when the radio button changes
|
| 366 |
+
latency_radio.change(
|
| 367 |
+
fn=create_pipeline_plot,
|
| 368 |
+
inputs=[dataframe_pipeline, latency_radio],
|
| 369 |
+
outputs=performance_plot
|
| 370 |
)
|
| 371 |
|
| 372 |
gr.Markdown(
|
|
|
|
| 386 |
eprint={2407.01449},
|
| 387 |
archivePrefix={arXiv},
|
| 388 |
primaryClass={cs.IR},
|
| 389 |
+
url={[https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01449](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01449)},
|
| 390 |
}
|
| 391 |
@misc{loison2026vidore,
|
| 392 |
title={ViDoRe V3: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation in Complex Real-World Scenarios},
|